A couple of weeks ago my productivity hit a boost by deploying the agents that I scoped to specific tasks in unity. Note the security-auditor – coding or working with AI is a OPSEC horror show .
A couple of weeks ago my productivity hit a boost by deploying the agents that I scoped to specific tasks in unity. Note the security-auditor – coding or working with AI is a OPSEC horror show .



September 19 – October 19, 2024This installation blurs the lines between private sanctuary and public marketplace, inviting visitors to rediscover the gallery as a lived-in bedroom turned intimate archive of three decades of cultural memory spanning the 1980s through early 2000s. Ghuneim’s meticulously curated world presents rare posters, gold records, vintage fashion, skate decks, pulp magazines, and vinyls not just as artifacts, but as lived objects of obsessions collected from the pit, the floor, the afterparty, and the morning after. Every item is available for purchase, transforming nostalgia into currency and challenging audiences to reflect on the value of memory in an age of constant reinvention.
By converting the most private of spaces into a public installation, SELLING MY LIFE asks viewers to consider: What is the value of a life lived through objects? What happens when sentimentality becomes currency? And who decides the price of memory?
Mark Ghuneim is a multidisciplinary artist whose work explores themes of memory, identity, and culture through visual media and ephemera. His projects span film, exhibition curation, and media, including co-producing Pixies: Gouge (BBC, 2001) and co-curating Public, Private, Secret at the International Center of Photography (2016–2017). A pioneer in surveillance discourse, Ghuneim collaborated with the NYCLU in the 1990s to map New York City’s cameras and later developed the Surveillance Index. He began his career as a pioneering VJ in New York’s club scene, producing visuals for MTV’s 120 Minutes, and went on to hold senior executive roles at the intersection of music and technology. SELLING MY LIFE is his most ambitious and personal project to date—an immersive act of autobiography, performance, and marketplace.
A portion of proceeds will be donated to MusiCares, a 501(c)3 that helps the humans behind music because music gives so much to the world. Offering preventive, emergency, and recovery programs, MusiCares is a safety net supporting the health and welfare of the music community.
THE GREAT JOY IN THINGS THAT ARE SAD A Documentary Theatre Piece Structure: Three interwoven timelines presented simultaneously on stage: - 1994: The night of the concert and recording - INTERVIEWS: Later reflections from Thom and Colin - JEFF'S VOICE: Buckley's artistic philosophy (from various times) Characters: - THOM (1994) / THOM (Interview) - COLIN (1994) / COLIN (Interview) - JEFF'S VOICE - Ethereal presence, speaking his philosophy - THE INTERVIEWER - Unseen, represented by light --- OPENING Three distinct spaces on stage. Lights isolate each as they speak. JEFF'S VOICE: (Center, timeless) I find great joy in the things that are sad. Not because I enjoy suffering, but because... sadness is honest. It doesn't pretend. THOM (Interview, stage left): (To interviewer) People ask about that night like it was planned. Like we knew we were going to see something that would... restructure us. COLIN (Interview, stage right): (Overlapping) We almost didn't go. Can you imagine? The alternate timeline where we stayed in the studio, grinding away at something that wasn't working? --- SCENE: "The Performance" The Garage, 1994. THOM and COLIN (1994) watch something we cannot see. COLIN (1994): Jesus. He's completely... THOM (1994): Exposed. JEFF'S VOICE: When I sing, I'm not in control. The moment is. You become a conduit for something that needs to exist. You can't fake that. You can't manufacture it. THOM (Interview): He gave me confidence to sing in falsetto. But it wasn't just technical. It was... permission. Permission to not armor myself. COLIN (1994): (Whispering) He's singing with just a Telecaster and a pint of Guinness. THOM (1994): And his entire soul. COLIN (Interview): You could feel the room change. Three hundred people breathing as one. That's when I knew Thom was going to do something different when we got back to the studio. --- SCENE: "The Return" RAK Studios, late night. The spaces begin to blend. THOM (1994): (To engineer) Three takes. That's all. If we don't have it in three, we never will. COLIN (Interview): He went straight from The Garage to the studio. Didn't even take his coat off. JEFF'S VOICE: The most intense experience. When you're in it, you're not you anymore. You're the song. You're the emotion. You're everything and nothing. THOM (1994): (At microphone) First take. He closes his eyes. When he opens his mouth, we see but don't hear - his body language tells us everything. THOM (Interview): It was like meditating. I felt completely detached from my own identity. I wasn't Thom Yorke trying to sing a song. I was... a vessel. --- SCENE: "The Breaking" All timelines converge. The stage becomes one space. COLIN (1994): Second take. THOM (1994): (Deeper into the song) The falsetto comes. Not forced. Invited. JEFF'S VOICE: People think vulnerability is weakness. But vulnerability is the only real strength we have. It's saying: "This is me, without costume, without pretense." COLIN (Interview): Third take. That was the one. THOM (1994): (Finishing, standing still) ... COLIN (1994): Thom? THOM (1994) begins to cry. Not performing crying - the real, ugly, beautiful kind. COLIN (Interview): He became emotional afterward. We all did. It was like watching someone be born. Or maybe watching someone finally stop trying not to be born. THOM (Interview): That vulnerability Buckley showed me - it wasn't about being weak. It was about being courageous enough to be seen. Really seen. --- SCENE: "The Philosophy" All characters face forward. Speaking to us directly. JEFF'S VOICE: I find great joy in the things that are sad because they connect us to our humanity. When we sing from that place, we're not entertaining. We're communing. THOM (Interview): After that night, I understood that the falsetto wasn't about hitting high notes. It was about letting go of the protection that low notes gave me. COLIN (Interview): One concert. Three takes. A career-defining moment. THOM (1994): (To COLIN) Did we get it? COLIN (1994): We got more than that. We got ourselves. JEFF'S VOICE: The creative moment can't be controlled. It can only be surrendered to. And in that surrender, we find who we really are. THOM (Both versions, in unison): He gave me confidence to sing in falsetto. But more than that - he gave me confidence to sing as myself. --- EPILOGUE Single spot on JEFF'S VOICE, center stage. JEFF'S VOICE: Every artist has a moment where they choose: protect yourself or offer yourself. The Garage, a studio in London, three takes in the middle of the night - these are just coordinates. What matters is the choice. To find great joy in the things that are sad. To be consumed by the creative moment. To sing not from your throat, but from the part of you that remembers what it's like to be infinite and fragile at the same time. Lights expand to include all characters. ALL: (In harmony, not unison) Without armor. Blackout. END --- Note: This piece uses documented quotes and recollections to explore the artistic transmission between Buckley and Yorke, examining how vulnerability in performance can inspire and transform other artists.
The Coldplay concert video perfectly illustrating the public is now complicit participating in the surveillance state. As we race to the bottom becoming the worst possible humans, you can choose not to participate in this behavior before it becomes the permanent norm. No one comfortable expressing themselves in any way, its been happening in front of all of our eyes over the last 4 decades, it’s horribly corrosive and self destructive at a societal levels
Regulation by Deal Comes to Higher Ed
https://balkin.blogspot.com/2025/07/regulation-by-deal-comes-to-higher-ed.html
Czech president signs law criminalising communist propaganda
https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/news/czech-president-signs-law-criminalising-communist-propaganda/
Fascism For First Time Founders
https://www.techdirt.com/2025/07/17/fascism-for-first-time-founders/
Death by AI
https://davebarry.substack.com/p/death-by-ai
AI is killing the web. Can anything save it?
https://www.economist.com/business/2025/07/14/ai-is-killing-the-web-can-anything-save-it
Czech president signs law criminalising communist propaganda
https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/news/czech-president-signs-law-criminalising-communist-propaganda/
AI-native tasks
https://github.com/google-labs-code/jules-awesome-list?tab=readme-ov-file#ai-native-tasks
Protecting My Attention at the Dopamine Carnival
https://www.amirsharif.com/protecting-my-attention-at-the-dopamine-carnival
History of Science & Technology
https://www.sothebys.com/en/buy/auction/2025/history-of-science-technology?lotFilter=AllLots
“At Windsurf, we have always believed that there is a unique opportunity “
https://x.com/jeffwsurf/status/1943805677270622570
Wade Guyton—Untitled, Untitled, 2024. Epson UltraChrome HDX inkjet on linen, 84 x 69 inches (WG5703)
https://shop.fondationbeyeler.ch/en/artikel/wade-guytonuntitled-untitled-2024-epson-ultrachrome-hdx-inkjet-on-linen-84-x-69-inches-wg5703-2025-36847
On July 23rd, the Trump administration issued a series of executive orders on artificial intelligence that amount to a sweeping federal power grab. These orders use the weight of federal procurement to enforce ideological conformity, gut environmental oversight, and override state authority—all under the guise of promoting “neutral” AI.
📄 Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence
7/31 Adding Global AI Governance Action Plan
https://www.mfa.gov.cn/eng/xw/zyxw/202507/t20250729_11679232.html
These executive orders don’t just guide AI policy—they enforce federal ideology. Under the banner of “bias prevention,” they require companies to strip references to systemic racism, transgender identity, and other so-called “manipulated” concepts to remain eligible for federal contracts. Simultaneously, they sideline copyright protections and environmental safeguards to accelerate AI infrastructure development.
The orders:
Ignore fair use and copyright liability concerns.
Encourage AI exports that risk violating international IP norms.
Impose “truthfulness” mandates that may require AI to regurgitate copyrighted content or censor factual nuance.
Bottom line: Copyright and fair use are sacrificed for ideological conformity. This is a false construct as we have seen that China has over and over released high value low cost models that destroys the premise. It like they are not even paying attention to market conditions.
The administration calls climate protections a bureaucratic “burden”—and acts accordingly:
Revokes Biden-era DEI and climate rules for federal AI infrastructure projects.
Fast-tracks massive data centers (100+ MW) with minimal environmental review.
Prioritizes fossil fuels over renewables.
Creates categorical exclusions to bypass impact assessments.
Translation: Climate concerns are now obstacles to be removed— environment be dammed –
Despite claiming to respect the private market, the federal government is:
Seizing federal land for AI data centers.
Imposing permitting that overrides state environmental laws.
Enforcing federal procurement standards that effectively dictate terms across the AI industry.
Preempting state policies through export controls and interstate standards.
Result: States may set their own rules, but the real market now plays by Washington’s.
The most chilling shift: forced ideological compliance through procurement contracts.
Banned from AI models:
Transgender identity (“transgenderism”)
Systemic racism
Unconscious bias
Intersectionality
Critical race theory
Mechanism:
Companies must purge these concepts from models to be eligible for federal contracts.
Violators face “decommissioning fees” and loss of future eligibility.
File under economic coercion—a backdoor censorship regime.
These orders cross core constitutional boundaries:
Viewpoint discrimination: Government cannot declare transgender identity or systemic racism as “ideological bias.”
Compelled speech: Forcing AI systems to align with a specific ideology violates First Amendment protections.
Contract-based censorship: Using federal money to dictate private speech is still a form of government control.
Amounts to federally enforced erasure.
Here’s what these policies look like in practice:
Federal workers will use AI tools that deny transgender identity exists.
Contractors must adopt sanitized, government-approved language.
Academic research on racism or gender risks blacklisting.
A split AI market emerges: one version for the government, another for the rest of society.
These executive orders cloak authoritarian overreach in the language of “trustworthy AI.” In reality, they:
Undermine copyright and environmental protections.Override state authority.
Use contracts to compel ideological conformity.
Penalize acknowledgment of race, gender, and inequality.
Thought control through government contracts. Orwell, meet procurement policy.